Cases 1 - 10 of 300
Wheat, Brandon Loyd v. Snyder
as 2:2024cv14082
Plaintiff:
Brandon Loyd Wheat
Defendant:
Sheriff William L Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentel Pickens
Defendant:
Ms. Morgan, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Rayburn Correctional Center
as 24-30013
Plaintiff:
Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Defendant:
Rayburn Correctional Center, Travis Day and Karla Wheat
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv50001
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheat v. Bradshaw
as 9:2023cv81593
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wheat
Defendant:
Sheriff Ric Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blanton v. Sharp et al
as 4:2023cv04767
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton
Defendant:
Lynn Sharp, Amber Ochoa, William J Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Lumpkin
as 23-40525
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lavace Morgan
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, William J. Wheat, Warden, Beto Unit, William Bradley, Guard, Beto Unit and others
Blackburn v. LeBlanc et al
as 6:2023cv01051
Plaintiff:
Leonard E Blackburn
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Rayburn Correctional Institution, Karla Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Aramark et al
as 1:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
Robert Lamont Lee
Defendant:
Aramark, Naphcare, Rockdale County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
