Cases 1 - 10 of 513
Majarro v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Noe Carrillo Majarro
Defendant:
Warden D. Baysore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Wilson v. Molina et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Combs Wilson
Defendant:
C. Molina, J. Banania, B. Madrigal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mascarenos v. Rio Arriba County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mascarenos
Defendant:
Rio Arriba County Jail, James LNU and FNU Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Nunez, J. Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Goodwin v. Gomez et al
as 2:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Patrick Glenn Goodwin and Patrick Glen Goodwin
Defendant:
A. Gomez, A. Hidalgo, L. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo-Majarro v. USA
as 3:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Noe Carrillo-Majarro
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Morales v. Mike et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lee Lua Morales
Defendant:
Mike, Enrique Carrillo and Joel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Carrillo-Carrillo v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01690
Petitioner:
Samuel E. Carrillo-Carrillo
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Guzman, Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
Zasha L Carrillo
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
