Cases 1 - 10 of 36
CARDWELL v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, DEPUTY TAYLOR, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. TICE, et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PARKER
Defendant:
E. TICE, M. HOUSER, M. PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Grefer v. Schenck et al
as 9:2022cv01389
Petitioner:
Charles R. Grefer
Respondent:
Cayuga County Sheriff, DOCCS NYS and Brian Schenck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Schenck
as 9:2022cv01334
Petitioner:
Ramaine Williams
Respondent:
Cayuga County Sheriff, New York State Dept of Correction and Brian Schenck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bass v. Schenck et al
as 9:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Johann Alexander Bass
Defendant:
Brian P. Schenck, William Steven Smith, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuniga v. Schenck et al
as 2:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Albert B Zuniga
Defendant:
Robert C Schenck, Bexar County Metropolitan Health District, University Health Science Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01346
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SNIDER v. ALVAREZ et al
as 3:2020cv00241
Respondent:
Officer Heckert, C/O KILLEEN, Captain Eichenberg and others
Defendant:
ROBIN ALVAREZ and STEVENS
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARNES v. MEDVA et al
as 3:2019cv00202
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET SECURITY DEPT., LT. LINDSEY, CO GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DANTE BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
