Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Zuniga v. Hartman et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Zuniga
Defendant:
Hartman, Eric Wood, Willhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Dyer et al
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
James E. Scott
Defendant:
Dyer, Sheriff Joe Lombardo, State of Nevada Ex Rel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willhite v. Pennington et al
as 6:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Sarrah Denton Willhite
Defendant:
Hannah Pennington, Tyler Pennington, Sgt Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willhite v. Pennington et al
as 3:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Sarrah Denton Willhite
Defendant:
Hannah Pennington, Tyler Pennington, Sgt Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Eugene Hunter v. Richard Acosta et al
as 2:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
Brandon Eugene Hunter
Defendant:
Richard Acosta, Mike Nelson, Jamie Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willhite v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00028
Petitioner:
Sheri Willhite
Defendant:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willhite v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00025
Petitioner:
Sheri Willhite
Defendant:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willhite v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00024
Petitioner:
Sheri Willhite
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willhite v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00041
Petitioner:
Sheri Willhite
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willhite v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00042
Petitioner:
Sheri Willhite
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
