Cases 1 - 10 of 30,340
Dildy v. City of North Charleston et al
as 2:2024cv03612
Plaintiff:
Leangelo Dildy
Defendant:
City of North Charleston, John Doe, Jared Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Clincy v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Trevon Marquise Clincy
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Attaway v. Glover et al
as 3:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Micheal N.B. Attaway
Defendant:
C/O Glover, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Leposky et al
as 3:2024cv01543
Plaintiff:
John U. Singleton
Defendant:
G. Leposky, Lightfoot, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Flowers
Defendant:
Warden Galloway, Sgt. Bernard, C/O Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirchner v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Brian Kirchner
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Cantley v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1532
Plaintiff:
AARON DANIEL CANTLEY
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and JOHN DOE
Londell Alston v. City of Rock Hill
as 24-6594
Plaintiff:
LONDELL LASHUN ALSTON
Defendant:
CITY OF ROCK HILL, COUNTY OF YORK, ROCK HIL POLICE DEPARTMENT JOHN DOE #1 and others
Hale v. Bell County Fiscal Court et al
as 6:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Melvin Hale
Defendant:
Bell County Fiscal Court, Gary Ferguson, Deputy Joshua Collett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gladney v. Silva et al
as 2:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Myron A Gladney
Defendant:
Nathaniel Silva, Sgt Nelson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
