Cases 31 - 39 of 39
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 64 DRUMS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART: ALFRED L. WOLFF, INC., PO 660 (LOT#1014), CHICAGO, IL 60601, WHITE HONEY, PRODUCT OF CHINA, GROSS 311.5 KG/NET 290 KG, FCL #OO
as 2:2010cv04461
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
64 DRUMS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART: ALFRED L. WOLFF, INC., PO 660 (LOT#1014), CHICAGO, IL 60601, WHITE HONEY, PRODUCT OF CHINA, GROSS 311.5 KG/NET 290 KG, FCL #OO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 64 DRUMS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART: (DRUM) CHINESE BEE'S HONEY, NW 290KGS, GW311.5KGS, PRODUCTS OF CHINA, BATCH NO. 16691
as 2:2010cv02618
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
64 DRUMS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART: (DRUM) CHINESE BEE'S HONEY, NW 290KGS, GW311.5KGS, PRODUCTS OF CHINA, BATCH NO. 16691
Movant:
ALFRED L. WOLFF, INC.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALL OF LOT 17 AND PART OF LOTS 18 AND 19, GOLD HILL TOWNSHIP, ON THE SOUTHSIDE OF NC HWY. 152 AND MARKET ST., A/K/A 419 CHINA GROVE HWY., ROCKWELL, ROWAN COUNTY, NC, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVE
as 1:2009cv00847
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALL OF LOT 17 AND PART OF LOTS 18 AND 19, GOLD HILL TOWNSHIP, ON THE SOUTHSIDE OF NC HWY. 152 AND MARKET ST., A/K/A 419 CHINA GROVE HWY., ROCKWELL, ROWAN COUNTY, NC, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States Of America v. All Funds on Deposit in any and all U.S. Interbank Accounts Maintained at the Bank of China New York Branch by the Bank of China, up to and Including the Amount of $13,514.00, which Sum Reflects et al
as 4:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
All Funds on Deposit in any and all U.S. Interbank Accounts Maintained at the Bank of China New York Branch by the Bank of China, up to and Including the Amount of $13,514.00, which Sum Reflects, All Funds on Deposit in any and all U.S. Interbank Accounts Maintained at the Bank of China New York Branch by the Bank of China, up to and Including the Amount of $72,493.00, Which Sum Reflects and All Funds on Deposit in any and all U.S. Interbank Accounts Maintained at the Bank of China New York Branch by the Bank of China, up to and Including the Amount of $60,381.00, Which Sum Reflects
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. U.S. Arms Corp (AIG) M1 rifle, 30 call, serial number 3417452 et al
as 2:2008cv00229
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
U.S. Arms Corp (AIG) M1 rifle, 30 call, serial number 3417452, Robinson Armament Co. M96 rifle, 556 cal, serial number HP99000586, Springfield Firearms Corporation, M1 Grand rifle, 30-06 cal, serial number 1179880 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $264,071.74 in funds from Bank of China et al
as 3:2007cv00580
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$264,071.74 in funds from Bank of China and $48,287.23 in funds from Bank of China
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Forfeiture
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 6000 China Grade Road, Happy Camp, California
as 2:2007cv01712
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 6000 China Grade Road, Happy Camp, California
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. 10 Drums of Hoodia Extract Imported from the People's Republic of China
as 1:2007cv00232
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
10 Drums of Hoodia Extract Imported from the People's Republic of China
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. 40 Drums of Hoodia Extract Imported from the People's Republic of China
as 1:2007cv00231
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
40 Drums of Hoodia Extract Imported from the People's Republic of China
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
