Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 161
United States Of America v. Remington Arms Company, INC., Mohawk 10 C .22 Caliber Rifle et al
as 3:2018cv00098
Respondent: Approximately 2,128 Rounds of Unknown Ammunition and Remington Arms Company, INC., Mohawk 10 C .22 Caliber Rifle
Petitioner: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Taurus, Model 85 Protector Poly, .38 Caliber Revolver et al
as 1:2018cv00195
Defendant: Taurus, Model 85 Protector Poly, .38 Caliber Revolver and Remington Model 7400, 30-06 Caliber Rifle
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
USA v. Browning Rifle, .270 cal., Serial No. 7L41438, with a Leupold Scope and Weaver Mounts et al
as 2:2018cv00087
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Browning Rifle, .270 cal., Serial No. 7L41438, with a Leupold Scope and Weaver Mounts, Remington 870 Shotgun, 12 gauge Serial No. B324297M and Topper M48, Harrington & Richardson Arms Co., Serial No. H68147
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
United States of America v. Connecticut Valley Arms (BP Firearms LLC) Unknown Rifle CAL, et al.
as 3:2018cv00037
Defendant: 123 Rounds Assorted Ammunition CAL: Multi, 1312 Rounds Assorted Ammunition CAL: Multi, 1952 Rounds Assorted Ammunition CAL: Multi and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1903 Petition to enforce administrative summon
United States of America v. One Million One Hundred Thirty One Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety Two Dollars ($1,131,792.00) In U.S. Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv14005
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One Million One Hundred Thirty One Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety Two Dollars ($1,131,792.00) In U.S. Currency, One .40 S&W caliber. Glock, model 22 Gen 4, semiautomatic pistol with serial number ZUX172;, One .45 Automatic caliber, Glock, model 21 Gen 4, semiautomatic pistol with serial number SAV782 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
IMO Glock GMBH 22 pistol,40 caliber, SN: WTP564; et al
as 2:2017cv00405
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Glock GMBH 22 pistol,40 caliber, SN: WTP564, Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle, 556 caliber, Springfield Armory pistol and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Firearm Bushmaster Firearms Carbon 15 Rifle .223 Caliber, Serial E08928 et al
as 2:2017cv13079
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Firearm Bushmaster Firearms Carbon 15 Rifle .223 Caliber, Serial E08928, Firearm WWI (Windham Weaponry, Inc.) WW-15 Rifle .556 caliber, Serial WW092468, Firearm Bushmaster Firearms XM15-E2S Rifle .223 caliber, Serial BK1100884 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Ammunition Fifty-Two (52) Rounds, multi calibers et al
as 1:2017cv12693
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ammunition Fifty-Two (52) Rounds, multi calibers, Ammunition components Three Hundred Twenty-Nine (329) multi calibers, Firearm Mossberg Model 500C .20 gauge Shotgun, SN: K515276 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Boyd's Personal Property et al
as 5:2017cv00406
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Boyd's Personal Property, $13,844.00 IN U. S. CURRENCY, FN HERSTAL PISTOL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Seventeen Miscellaneous Firearms and Assorted Ammunition, including: One Lewis Machine and Tools Co., Model Defender, .556 caliber rifle, serial number: LMT74 et al
as 1:2017cv02683
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Seventeen Miscellaneous Firearms and Assorted Ammunition, including: One Lewis Machine and Tools Co., Model Defender, .556 caliber rifle, serial number: LMT74, Forty-seven rounds of assorted ammunition, .556 caliber, One Ithica Gun Co., Model 37, 20 gauge feartherlight shotgun, serial number: 371105624 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0922

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?