Cases 61 - 70 of 88
USA v. $144,178.98 In United States Currency
as 7:2012cv00109
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$144,178.98 In United States Currency
Claimant:
Ben D. Tackett, Sr. and Estate of Julia A. Tackett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
U S A v. Mike's Auto Sales Inc Assets et al
as 5:2012cv02164
Defendant:
Mikes Auto Sales Inc Assets , A-1 Auto Finance Co Assets , Mikes Auto Sales Inc Stock and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
Citizens National Bank N A , William Paul Boyter , Jennifer Schultz Boyter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Approximately $38,474.56 seized from United Security Bank account number 10101476
as 1:2012cv01271
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $38,474.56 seized from United Security Bank account number 10101476
Claimant:
Ethele Barron and EB Preferred Property Management Real Estate Brokers Trust
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 110 Maple Street, Medford, New York, 11763 et al
as 2:2012cv02055
Defendant:
Any Funds on Deposit at Chase Bank, Account Number 3140259058 Held in the Name of JFP Enterprises, Any Funds on Deposit at Chase Bank, Account Number 3140259694 Held in the Name of John P. Franz, Any Funds on Deposit at Chase Bank, Account Number 938572840 Held in the Name of John P. Franz and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $30,000.00 et al
as 2:2012cv02289
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$30,000.00, Five Million Nine Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Thirty-One Dollars Thirty-Three Cents($5,988,031.33) in U.S. Funds, All Funds on Deposit and Credited to Eleven(11) Assorted Edward Jones Financial Accounts and others
Claimant:
Sylvia McAlpin , Wayne David McAlpin, Jr. , Budget Auto Sales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
United States v. Kristin L. Dougherty
as 12-1809
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Movant - Appellant:
Kristin L. Dougherty
Defendant:
Real Property located at Parcel No. 71-17A Estate Fish Bay, No. 8 Reef Bay Quarter, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, PWD No. D9-7414-T004, along with all its buildings, appurtenances, and improvements
United States of America v. $40,000.00 in United States Currency et al
as 1:2011cv00850
Defendant:
$40,000.00 In United States Currency and Funds in the Amount of $16,489.03 from Old National Bank Account Number Ending **7487
Claimant:
Mary Hill and Estate of Greg Hill
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Real Property located at Parcel No. 71-17A Estate Fish Bay, No. 8 Reef Bay Quarter, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, PWD No. D9-7414-T004, along with all its buildings, appurtenances, and improvements
as 4:2011cv00818
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property located at Parcel No. 71-17A Estate Fish Bay, No. 8 Reef Bay Quarter, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, PWD No. D9-7414-T004, along with all its buildings, appurtenances, and improvements
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. 1777 Old Camp Trail, NW Conyers, GA et al
as 1:2011cv01534
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1777 Old Camp Trail, NW, Conyers, GA, 1766 Old Camp Trail, NW, Conyers, Georgia, 1700 Old Camp Trail, NW, Conyers, Georgia and others
Claimant:
Larry Simmons and All-Star Properties & Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE (1) PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, KNOWN AS CABANA BAYAMESA et al
as 1:2011cv20802
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ONE (1) PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, KNOWN AS CABANA BAYAMESA, ONE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC KNOWN AS PARCEL 95-A-4-D-1, ONE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC KNOWN AS PARCEL 407 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
