Cases 81 - 90 of 109
USA v. $201,214.51 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2011cv00551
Defendant:
$201,214.51 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Daniel Jester and Sharon Roys
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $47,342.28 in Funds from NAE Federal Credit Union Account Number 227056, et al
as 2:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$47,342.28 in Funds from NAE Federal Credit Union Account Number 227056 and $5,300.29 in Funds from NAE Federal Credit Union Account Number 205044
Claimant:
James Glenn Daniels
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5317
United States of America v. $67,920.94 in US Currency seized from JP Morgan Chase Account No. XXXXX3710
as 2:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$67,920.94 in US Currency seized Account No. *****3710 located at JPMorgan Bank
Claimant:
Daniel Leitman and Star Insurance Services LLC
Cause Of Action: Search and forfeiture of monetary instruments
USA v. One Parcel of Property located 20 Warner Road, Barkhamsted, CT, With all Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon et al
as 3:2010cv01760
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
One Parcel of Property Located 20 Warner Road, Barkhamsted, CT, with all Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon
Claimant:
Daniel Jester and Sharon Roys
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 4527-4535 Michigan Avenue, Detroit, Michigan
as 2:2010cv14164
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 4527-4535 Michigan Avenue, Detroit, Michigan
Claimant:
Daniel Hill , Carl Bernas , Charles R Bokun and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. $304,041.01 on Deposit at Citibank, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv04858
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$304,041.01 on Deposit at Citibank, N.A., Approximately $297,000 on Deposit at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, One 2005 Bentley Continental, Vin SCBCR63W15C025200, Florida Vehicle Reg. No. PDF5C and others
Claimant:
Annette Bongiorno, Rudy Bongiorno and Hudson City Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
USA v. 8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Flor, et al
as 10-5061
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy, Florida 32351, One Condo Located On North Ocean Boulevard In Myrtle Beach, South Carolina and All Funds Including Approximately $53 Million, On Deposit At Bank Of America Accounts Of (1) Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., , (2) Clarence Busby, Jr. & Dawn Stowers,& (3) Golden Panda Ad Builder, Thomas A. Bowdoin, Jr., Sole Proprietor, dba Adsurfdaily; Clarenc
Claimant - Appellant:
Adsurfdaily, Inc., Thomas A. Bowdoin and Bowdoin Harris Enterprises, Inc.
Claimant - Appellee:
Golden Panda Ad Builder, Clarence Busby, Michael Haws and others
United States of America v. Remington 700 Rifle et al
as 1:2010cv00027
Defendant:
Remington 700 Rifle, Winchester 70 Rifle, Smith and Wesson SW9F Pistol and others
Claimant:
Daniel Molina
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Various Real Properties
as 0:2009cv61780
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Petitioner:
D&L Partners, L.P., D3 Capital Club, LLC, The Von Allmen Dynasty Trust and others
Defendant:
Various Real Properties, Real Properties (RP9) through (RP21), Vehicles and Vessels (VV1) through (VV27) and others
Claimant:
VRLP1, LLC, Razorback Funding, LLC, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Property forfeiture from criminal acts
United States of America v. Assets Described in "Attachment A" to the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem
as 6:2009cv01852
Claimant:
First Security Bank & Trust Company, Raul Rojer, Skyview Construction, LLC and others
Defendant:
Assets Described in "Attachment A" to the Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
