Cases 1 - 7 of 7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY
as 5:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY
Claimant:
REGINALD MADDOX
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $90,060.00 in U.S. Currency
as 5:2021cv01678
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$90,060.00 in U.S. Currency
Intervenor:
Reginald D. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $27,189.00, more or less, in U.S. Currency
as 1:2020cv00476
Defendant:
$27, 189.00, more or less, in U.S. Currency and $27,189.00, more or less, in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Reginald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $249,640.12 in United States currency, et al
as 3:2015cv05586
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$249,640.12 in United States currency, $725.72 in United States currency, $2,781.00 in United States currency and others
Claimant:
King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc. , Robert Reginald Comenout, Sr. , Sophia Comenout and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
United States of America v. 2010 Nissan Maxima, VIN: 1N4AA5AP3AC856053
as 4:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2010 Nissan Maxima, VIN: 1N4AA5AP3AC856053
Claimant:
Reginald L. Bond
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2001LEXUS LS430 VIN#JTHBN30FX10018098 et al
as 3:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
2001 LEXUS LS430 VIN#JTHBN30FX10018098 and 2003 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER VIN#SALME11433A140562
Claimant:
Reginald Brooks
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 911 BOOKER DRIVE
as 1:2007cv00307
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
911 BOOKER DRIVE
Claimant:
REGINALD JEROME ROGERS, REGINALD JEROME ROGERS, FRANCESSE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
