Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
United States of America v. Crump et al
as 2:2023cv02801
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $808.00 in United States Currency, $2,191.00 in United States Currency, $8,200.00 in United States Currency and others
Claimant: Carlos Crump, Jereika Young, Roy Lee Johnson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Gents 10kt White Gold Diamond Pendant, With Custom #800 Design, Weighing Approximately 30.6 Grams and Hanging from 4mm Wide Sterling Silver Diamond Cut Rope Chain, et al
as 1:2021cv00622
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Gents 10kt White Gold Diamond Pendant, With Custom #800 Design, Weighing Approximately 30.6 Grams and Hanging from 4mm Wide Sterling Silver Diamond Cut Rope Chain,, Gents 10kt Two Tone Diamond Pendant, With Custom #800 Design, With Raised Name L. Roy, Weighing Approximately 80.9 Grams and Hanging from A 22 Inch, 4mm Wide Diamond Cut Rope Chain, $5,605.00 United States Currency and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. One (1) Remington Arms Company, Inc. 770 Rifle CAL:30-06 SN:M71943029 et al
as 2:2020cv02278
Defendant: One (1) New England Firearms Pardner Shotgun CAL:410 SN:NL306519, One (1) Remington Arms Company, Inc. 522 Viper Rifle CAL:22 SN:3193409 and One (1) Remington Arms Company, Inc. 770 Rifle CAL:30-06 SN:M71943029
Claimant: Patrick Riddick, Roy Rogers and Kristy Marie Rogers
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY $47,459.35
as 2:2017cv08597
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY $47,459.35
Claimant: ROY JOHANNES GILLAR
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
United States of America v. 643 Alpensee Drive, Breckenridge, Eagle County, Colorado, ncluding all Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements thereon et al
as 6:2014cv00879
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 643 Alpensee Drive, Breckenridge, Eagle County, Colorado, ncluding all Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements thereon, 33.204 acres of real property located on Roy Road, Tyler, Smith County, Texas, including all Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements thereon, 608 North 6th, Wolfforth, Lubbock County, Texas, including all Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements thereon and others
Claimant: Austin Bank, Texas N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Tompkins et al v. Adham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv01904
Plaintiff: Jimmy M Tompkins and United States of America
Defendant: Abdullah N. Adham , Louise Lamarre, Benedict O Olusola and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America v. One Parcel Of Real Property located at 19127 SW 65th Street, Pembroke Pines, Broward County, Florida We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2012cv61226
Defendant: One Parcel of Real Property located at 19127 SW 65th Street, Pembroke Pines, Broward County, Florida
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Diana Ingeborg Roy , Hugo Slater and Nakia Rawls
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 5313
United States of America v. 2004 Ford Mustang GT et al
as 1:2012cv00650
Defendant: 2004 Ford Mustang GT and 1995 Buick Regal Custom
Claimant: Michael Roy Sing
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2005 Nissan Titan XE et al
as 1:2012cv00634
Defendant: 2005 Nissan Titan XE, Savage Model Stevens 84C .22 Cal Rifle and Smith & Wesson Model SW40V .40 Cal Pistol
Claimant: Roy Madrid , Ruben Bustillos, Joshua M. Tornberg and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $201,214.51 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2011cv00551
Defendant: $201,214.51 in United States Currency
Claimant: Daniel Jester and Sharon Roys
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?