Cases 11 - 20 of 21
SEIU Healthcare Michigan v. Eastwood Convalescent Center, Inc.
as 2:2013cv10584
Plaintiff:
SEIU Healthcare Michigan
Defendant:
Eastwood Convalescent Center, Inc.
Eastwood v. Putnam County Alcohol and Drug Council, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00732
Plaintiff:
Karen Eastwood
Defendant:
Putnam County Alcohol and Drug Council, Inc. and SMA Behavioral Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Abbott v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv02572
Plaintiff:
Jesse F. Yarger, Frances Junann Smith, Miriam F. Jeralds and others
Defendant:
Sprint Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Reyburn v. Eastwood Motel Inc
as 2:2011cv01609
Plaintiff:
Terrence Reyburn
Defendant:
Eastwood Motel Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dill v. Eastwood Homes Inc
as 6:2011cv00297
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Dill
Defendant:
Eastwood Homes Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Rebecca Houpt v. Eastwood Insurance Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv07726
Defendant:
DOES, Eastwood Insurance Services, Inc., Nationwide Mutual Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Houpt
Hyatt et al v. The Town of Wytheville
as 7:2010cv00278
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Akers, Leigh Ann Altizer, Lonnie C. Anders and others
Defendant:
The Town of Wytheville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sharpe v. Eastwood Post No. 1276 et al
as 5:2009cv00995
Plaintiff:
Michael Sharpe and Michael Sharpe
Defendant:
Eastwood Post No. 1276, Patrick C. Tortora, Sr., William A. Tewell and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Huynh v. Eastwood Insurance Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv02386
Plaintiff:
Lac Huynh
Defendant:
Eastwood Insurance Services, Inc., Judith Partridge and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Phaneuf v. Eastwood Mulch, Inc.
as 9:2007cv80227
Plaintiff:
Francis Phaneuf
Defendant:
Eastwood Mulch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
