Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Dodenhoff v. Geithner et al
as 2:2011cv00890
Plaintiff:
Dennis A. Dodenhoff
Defendant:
Timothy Geithner and Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Middleton v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Evelyn L. Middleton
Defendant:
United States of America and Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Evelyn Middleton v. US
as 10-1978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVELYN L. MIDDLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Middleton v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
Evelyn L. Middleton
Defendant:
United States of America and Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Carstens v. Michigan Department of Treasury et al
as 1:2009cv01596
Plaintiff:
DONALD CARSTENS
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Carstens v. Michigan Department of Treasury et al
as 1:2009cv00664
Plaintiff:
Donald Carstens
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Treasury and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
PALUMBO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, DIVISION OF PENSIONS et al
as 2:2008cv05728
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE M. PALUMBO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, DIVISION OF PENSIONS, CITY OF NEWARK, CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In re Cardinal Health, Inc. ERISA Litigation
as 2:2004cv00643
Plaintiff:
David L McKeehan, James A Syracuse, Gint Baukus and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Kevin Stewart
Defendant:
Cardinal Health Inc, The Plan Committee, Richard Miller and others
Petitioner:
The State of New Jersey, Department of Treasury, Division of Investment, James DeCarlo, Charles Heitholt and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
