Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Westfall v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 6:2015cv03216
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Westfall
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ramirez Arredondo et al v. Westfall Masonry, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02370
Plaintiff:
Efrain Ramirez Arredondo and Mario Gustavo Ramirez Arredondo
Defendant:
Westfall Masonry, Inc. and Andrew Westfall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Prater et al v. Ohio Education Association
as 2:2004cv01077
Plaintiff:
James I. Prater, Harold J. Thorley, Joan P. Montgomery and others
Defendant:
Ohio Education Association
Petitioner:
Coalition of Retired Employees of Ohio Education Association
Intervenor:
Proffessional Staff Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
ABRAMOWICH et al v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
JOE J. ABRAMOWICH, JR. , JAMES F. CHEEK , GEORGE FRIEDLINE and others
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Westfall et al v. Bevan et al
as 3:2008cv00996
Plaintiff:
Fred Westfall, Fred Westfall, Timothy Westfall and others
Defendant:
Norman H Bevan, Jonathan Cocks, Raymond Wicker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Prater, et al v. Ohio Education Assoc
as 06-4393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES I. PRATER, on behalf of himself and a similarly situated class of retired OEA employees and their spouses, HAROLD J. THORLEY, JOAN P. MONTGOMERY and others
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKER STAFF COUNCIL and NATIONAL STAFF ORGANIZATION
Defendant / Appellee:
OHIO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
Kimpel, et al v. Williams, et al
as 2:1993cv03441
Plaintiff:
Michael L Kimpel, David G Ross, Luke W Magee and others
Defendant:
Willie Williams, Does 1 through 25, inclusive and City of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
