Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Maddox v. Teleflex Medical, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00616
Plaintiff:
Lisa Maddox
Defendant:
Teleflex Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Connie S. Maddox v. State Auto Property & Casualty
as 15-2641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE S. MADDOX
Defendant - Appellee:
MERIDIAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, as successor in interest to STATE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
MADDOX v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
as 5:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
TERESA MADDOX
Defendant:
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Maddox v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 3:2014cv00950
Plaintiff:
Sharon Maddox
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Doucette et al v. Directv, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02800
Plaintiff:
John Doucette, III , Farrell Flowers , James Maddox and others
Defendant:
Directv, Inc., DirecTV, LLC and Multiband Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barbara Beckerley et al v. Alorica, Inc.
as 8:2014cv00836
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Allen, Barbara Beckerley, Raymorn Edden and others
Defendant:
Alorica, Inc.
Lomenzo et al v. BL Imaging Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lomenzo , Carrie Jackson-Ardila , Erin C Maddox and others
Defendant:
BL Imaging Inc and Steven R Muckerheide
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maddox et al v. Metro Transportation, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv06665
Plaintiff:
Kale Maddox and David McGovern Jr.
Defendant:
Metro Transportation, Inc. and Adam Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Maddox et al v. The Village of Lincoln Heights, Ohio
as 1:2013cv00889
Plaintiff:
Steven R Maddox and Antwan L. Sparks
Defendant:
Lincoln Heights, Village of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
