Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Reyes v. Sears Holding Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv04719
Plaintiff:
Victor Reyes
Defendant:
Sears Holding Corporation, Sears Roebuck & Company and XPO Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
ESPINAL v. BOB'S DISCOUNT FURNITURE, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02854
Plaintiff:
OMAR A. ESPINAL
Defendant:
BOB'S DISCOUNT FURNITURE, LLC, XPO LOGISTICS, INC. and JANE AND JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Upton v. Con-Way Multimodal, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00232
Plaintiff:
Courtney M. Upton
Defendant:
Con-way Multimodal, Inc. , XPO Logistics, Inc. and Brett Eifler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Quinlan et al v. XPO Logistics, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Brice Quinlan and Laura Willis
Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc. and XPO Logistics of Delaware, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pregent et al v. XPO Logistics, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00993
Plaintiff:
Alexis Pregent , Jennifer Massat , Megan Kuchenbecker and others
Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Bey et al v. XPO Logistics, Inc.
as 6:2016cv02195
Plaintiff:
Reina Ortiz Bey , Ricardo Pacheco , Ashlee Allard and others
Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kramer v. XPO Logistics, Inc.
as 3:2016cv07039
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kramer
Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Wood v. XPO Logistics, Inc.
as 3:2016cv06681
Plaintiff:
Steve Wood
Defendant:
XPO Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PITTS v. 1ST CLASS STAFFING, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00445
Plaintiff:
RONALD PITTS
Defendant:
1ST CLASS STAFFING LLC, JACOBSON STAFFING COMPANY LC, JACOBSON PACKAGING COMPANY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617
I. Hernandez et al v. XPO Logistics, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03112
Defendant:
Does, Intermodal Container Services, Inc., Pacer International Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
I. Hernandez and E. Ortiz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
