Cases 31 - 40 of 61
McMillan v. Masrtech Group, Inc., et al
as 8:2013cv01520
Plaintiff:
Ary McMillan and Paul E. Smith
Defendant:
Masrtech Group, Inc. and Ahmed Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
NECA/IBEW Family Medical Care Plan et al v. Dew Electric, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
NECA/IBEW Family Medical Care Plan , Lindell Lee , Geary Higgins and others
Defendant:
Dew Electric, L.L.C. and David E. Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Smith et al
as 4:2012cv03686
Plaintiff:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Lindsey K. Smith, Earl Z. Smith, Dallas E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ana M Hanson et al v. D E Smith Company et al
as 2:2012cv04561
Defendant:
D E Smith Company and Does
Plaintiff:
Ana M Hanson and Gary J Meyers
Smith v. AS America, Inc.
as 3:2012cv05048
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Smith
Defendant:
AS America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Smith v. TRI Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01529
Plaintiff:
Darrell E Smith
Defendant:
Elwood TRI, Inc. and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hernandez v. B. Smith Enterprises, Ltd. et al
as 1:2012cv02889
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Enriquz Hernandez
Defendant:
B. Smith Enterprises, Ltd., Three Twenty Restaurant Row Corp and Barbara E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
24 Hour Fitness USA Inc v. Smith
as 2:2012cv00032
Petitioner:
24 Hour Fitness USA Inc
Respondent:
Shaun E Smith
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Martinez v. American Hawk Enterprises, LLC et al
as 0:2011cv62130
Plaintiff:
Brandon Martinez
Defendant:
American Hawk Enterprises, LLC and Jon E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Gould v. The Cram Group, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01734
Plaintiff:
Tony S. Gould
Defendant:
The Cram Group, LLC and Wesley E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
