Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Victor Frank et al v. CPC Logistics Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00675
Defendant:
CPC Logistics Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Paul Contreras, Victor Frank, Richard Hawkins and others
HOFFLER v. HOOPER HOLMES, INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02398
Plaintiff:
MILDRED HOFFLER
Defendant:
HOOPER HOLMES, INC. and HOOPER INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hill v. Gerturde K. Hooper Trust et al
as 6:2012cv00376
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Hill
Defendant:
Gerturde K. Hooper Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hooper v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 5:2011cv00624
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth L. Hooper
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Health Management Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hooper et al v. Capsco Industries, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00706
Plaintiff:
John C. Hooper , Charles W. Lawson , Larry Morrison and others
Defendant:
Capsco Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hooper v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 8:2011cv01603
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hooper
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hooper v. Wallace et al
as 1:2011cv01267
Plaintiff:
Maria Hooper
Defendant:
James E. Wallace and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Hooper et al v. Carlisle & Gallagher Consulting Group, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Geary Hooper and Frank Blazejewski
Defendant:
Carlisle & Gallagher Consulting Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rea v. Quality Christmas Trees, LTD et al
as 4:2010cv01282
Plaintiff:
Alma Rea
Defendant:
Quality Christmas Trees, LTD , Hooper Landscaping II, LLC and Matthew Hooper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
John Hooper, II, et al v. Archie Adam
as 10-5413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. HOOPER, II and JOHN M. HOOPER, III, Trustees of the Tennessee Wine & Spirits Company Individual Account Retirement Plan
Defendant - Appellee:
ARCHIE H. ADAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
