Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Howard v. Crossmark, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00249
Plaintiff:
Irvin Howard
Defendant:
Crossmark, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Boyd et al v. SFS Communications, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv03068
Plaintiff:
James Herbert Boyd, Jr. , John Christopher Poles , Steven Mitchell Borden and others
Defendant:
SFS Communications, LLC, Ferdous Ahmed Sharif, CU Employment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Clark et al v. Royal Transportation Company et al
as 2:2015cv13243
Plaintiff:
Debra Clark , Brooksey Irvine , Reginald Morrissette and others
Defendant:
Royal Transportation Company, Donald Fitzsimmons, Debra Fitzsimmons and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Irvin v. Ascension Parish School Board
as 3:2015cv00518
Defendant:
Ascension Parish School Board
Plaintiff:
Shelia A Irvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Irvins v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art et al
as 1:2015cv05180
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Plan Administrative Committee of the Metropolitan Museum of Art
Plaintiff:
Terrence Irvins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Turpin et al v. Autonation, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv02867
Plaintiff:
William Turpin , Jesus Flores , Paul Edwards and others
Defendant:
Autonation, Inc. , AN San Jose Luxury Imports, Inc. , Autonation Mercedes-Benz of Stevens Creek and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Irvine v. Destination Wild Dunes Management Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00980
Plaintiff:
John P Irvine
Defendant:
Destination Wild Dunes Management Inc , Destination Hotels & Resorts Inc and Lowe Hospitality Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hunt v. Con-Way Freight, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Irvin Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Swart v. Walker et al
as 5:2014cv01404
Plaintiff:
Courtney Swart
Defendant:
Dustin Walker , Calvin Irvin , Mutual Assurance Administrators Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
