Cases 51 - 60 of 137
Quick v. Essex Bank
as 3:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Megan J. Quick
Defendant:
Essex Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carmack v. Park Cities Healthcare LLC et al
as 3:2016cv03500
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Carmack
Defendant:
Park Cities Healthcare LLC and Sharon D Quick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McAllister v. Quick Park et al
as 1:2016cv09885
Plaintiff:
Morris McAllister
Defendant:
Quick Park and Teamsters Local 917
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Totte et al v. Quick Lane Oil & Lube et al
as 2:2016cv12850
Plaintiff:
Tom Totte , Cody Hitch and John Merrell
Defendant:
Quick Lane Oil & Lube and Talha Hares
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669, U.A., AFL-CIO v. CCR Fire Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00448
Defendant:
Earl Barnett, Rajendra Bhakta, CCR Fire Protection, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669, U.A., AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Maganti v. Quick Petroleum, Inc. et al
as 7:2016cv04927
Plaintiff:
Krishna Maganti
Defendant:
Quick Petroleum, Inc. and Asif Javed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Huegel v. Quick Mart Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv01450
Plaintiff:
Mark Huegel
Defendant:
Quick Mart Enterprises, Inc. and Muneer Albadawi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Quick v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
Pamela S Quick
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TOUGOUMA v. WASH INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL
as 2:2016cv00884
Plaintiff:
LASSANE TOUGOUMA
Defendant:
WASH INDUSTRIES, INC. , 18TH AVE WASH, LLC , BLUE BELL CAR WASH INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thompson v. Bed-Stuy Pharmacy Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07434
Defendant:
Bed-Stuy Pharmacy Inc., Elan Katz, N.G.B. Staffing Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Thompson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
