Cases 51 - 60 of 137
Santos Lamar v. Massapequa Diner, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03386
Defendant:
"John Doe #1", "John Doe #2", "John Doe #3" and others
Plaintiff:
Eddy Santos Lamar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lamar Dawson v. NCAA, et al
as 17-15973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMAR DAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and PAC-12 CONFERENCE
Jones v. Grand Faloon Tavern Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv00771
Plaintiff:
Perzhette Jones
Defendant:
Grand Faloon Tavern Inc. and Lamar Johnston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Campbell et al v. City of New York
as 1:2016cv08719
Plaintiff:
Henry Campbell , Jermaine Abraham , Edwin Rosario and others
Defendant:
City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dawson v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 3:2016cv05487
Plaintiff:
Lamar Dawson
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association and Pac-12 Conference
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Downs et al v. County of Alexander et al
as 3:2016cv00411
Plaintiff:
Adam Downs , Laborers' Local 773 , Sonya Taylor and others
Defendant:
County of Alexander , Chalen Tatum , Lamar Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dickey v. 3S Services, LLC
as 2:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dickey, JB Burns, Jr, Quentin B Burns and others
Defendant:
3S Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Lamar v. Lacy One LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00135
Plaintiff:
Seth Lamar
Defendant:
Lacy One LLC and Tammara Lacy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fields v. Cardinal Health et al
as 3:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamar Fields, Jr.
Defendant:
Cardinal Health and Michael Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Green v. Premier Telecommunication Services, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00332
Plaintiff:
Lamar Green
Defendant:
Premier Telecommunication Services, LLC, Van Huynh and Lynne Pang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
