Cases 61 - 70 of 198
Monroy-Gill v. Fresco News Incorporated et al
as 1:2017cv06743
Defendant:
Fresco News Incorporated, John Meyer, Jonathan Hamiter and others
Plaintiff:
Keana Monroy-Gill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Keogh et al v. Hamilton-Nee Air-Systems Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv11573
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Keogh , James Wool , John S. Desmond and others
Defendant:
Hamilton-Nee Air-Systems Corp.
Trustee:
Citizens Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Gill v. Bennett et al
as 4:2017cv00611
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Gill
Defendant:
Harry nmn Bennett, Bennett Cleaning Concepts and Top Brass Building Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker et al v. Helix TCS, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
William David Baker and Jeffrey Gill
Defendant:
Helix TCS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gill v. 314e Corporation
as 4:2017cv01062
Defendant:
314e Corporation
Plaintiff:
Barinder Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Julian v. MetLife, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00957
Plaintiff:
Debra Julian , Tonya Gill and Stephanie McKinney
Defendant:
MetLife, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and MetLife Insurance Company, USA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GILL v. AZTECA MILLING, L.P.
as 3:2017cv00014
Defendant:
AZTECA MILLING, L.P.
Plaintiff:
BYRON T. GILL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GILL v. BH MEDIA GROUP, INC.
as 1:2016cv09155
Plaintiff:
CARRIE GILL
Defendant:
BH MEDIA GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Gill v. Southern Sourcing LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00921
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Gill
Defendant:
Southern Sourcing LLC and Brandi Price
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Keogh et al v. Twin Tech Testing & Balancing, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11885
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Keogh , James Wool , John S. Desmond and others
Defendant:
Twin Tech Testing & Balancing, Inc.
Trustee:
Mechanics Cooperative Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
