Cases 71 - 80 of 5,753
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.- C.I.O. v. GG Painting Unlimited Corporation
as 1:2024cv01278
Petitioner:
District Council No. 9 Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. and District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.- C.I.O.
Respondent:
GG Painting Unlimited Corporation a/k/a G & G Painting Unlimited a/k/a GG Painting a/k/a GG Painting Unlimited a/k/a GG Painting & Unlimited Corp. a/k/a GG Maintenance Group LLC, GG Painting Unlimited Corporation, G & G Painting Unlimted, GG Painting and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Su v. BCK Coatings Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Julie A Su
Defendant:
BCK Coatings Incorporated doing business as BCK Coatings and Robert K Welch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Groden v. NASDI, LLC
as 24-1107
Plaintiff:
EDWARD F. GRODEN, Executive Director of the New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund
Defendant:
NASDI, LLC, f/k/a North American Site Developers, Inc.
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund et al v. E&K of Chicago, Inc., f/k/a Airtite Interiors, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Deferred Savings Fund and others
Defendant:
E&K of Chicago, Inc., f/k/a Airtite Interiors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. GG Painting Unlimited Corporation
as 1:2024cv01077
Petitioner:
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O.
Respondent:
GG Painting Unlimited Corporation a/k/a G & G Painting Unlimited a/k/a GG Painting a/k/a GG Painting Unlimited a/k/a GG Painting & Unlimited Corp. a/k/a GG Maintenance Group LLC, GG Painting Unlimited Corporation, G & G Painting Unlimited, GG Painting and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. MOORE ELEVATOR CO. LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM and others
Defendant:
MOORE ELEVATOR CO. LLC and JOHN MOORE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hernndez v. Rajjot Sweet & Snacks, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Hernndez
Defendant:
Rajjot Sweet & Snacks, Inc., Tek Gill, Balbinder Kaur and others
Automobile Mechanics Local No. 701 Union and Industry Pension Fund et al v. M & K Employee Solutions, LLC-Summit et al
as 1:2024cv01684
Plaintiff:
Automobile Mechanics Local No. 701 Union and Industry Pension Fund and Automobile Mechanics' Local No. 701 Union and Industry Welfare Fund
Defendant:
M & K Employee Solutions, LLC-Summit, M & K Employee Solutions, LLC-Northern Illinois, M & K Employee Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
Smith et al v. Sun Country, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Smith and Derik George
Defendant:
Sun Country, Inc., Board of Trustees of the Sun Country, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, The, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1149 Recover Pension & Profit Sharing
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. MAXIM HYDRAULICS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM and others
Defendant:
MAXIM HYDRAULICS INC. and MAX WASSEF
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
