Cases 81 - 90 of 203
Haynes v. Shelby County Board of Education, et al.
as 2:2017cv02305
Plaintiff:
Pamela Haynes
Defendant:
Shelby County Board of Education and Dorsey Hopson, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Avadawn Hargett v. Jefferson County Bd of Ed
as 17-5368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AVADAWN HARGETT
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Washington v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv02343
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Washington
Defendant:
Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Roe v. Wayne County Board of Education
as 3:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
Wayne County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
CERRATO et al v. DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2016cv01431
Defendant:
DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION and SSC SERVICE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
LILIAM BUSTILLO CERRATO , MARIA JUAREZ REGINO , YOLANDA PAVON GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARRY v. PENNSAUKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2016cv09230
Defendant:
PENNSAUKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BARRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Broyles v. Shelby County Board Of Education
as 2:2016cv02889
Plaintiff:
Lisa Broyles
Defendant:
Shelby County Board Of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Rhonda Smith, et al v. Birmingham Board of Education
as 16-16924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RHONDA SMITH, CLARENCE BATAIN, ANDRIANA HENRY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BIRMINGHAM BOARD OF EDUCATION
Walker v. Chicago Public Schools et al
as 1:2016cv10102
Plaintiff:
Aaron Walker
Defendant:
Chicago Public Schools and Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
