Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Beldock et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
Justin Beldock, Gordon Broward and Shaadi Nezami
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Board of Trustees of Microsoft Corporation, 401(K) Administrative Committee of the Microsoft Corporation Savings Plus 401(K) Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Tullgren v. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00856
Plaintiff:
Michael Tullgren
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., The Board of Trustees of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. and The Administrative Committee of the Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. Employees' Capital Accumulation Plan
Amicus Curiae:
The ERISA Industry Committee, The American Benefits Council and The American Retirement Association
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Funds
Trauernicht, et al. v. Genworth Financial Inc., et al.
as 3:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Peter Trauernicht and Zachary Wright
Defendant:
Genworth Financial Inc., The Board of Trustees of Genworth Financial Inc., The Fiduciary & Investments Committee of the Genworth Financial Inc. Retirement and Savings Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
The American Benefits Council, The ERISA Industry Committee, The American Retirement Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Kistler et al v. Stanley Black & Decker Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lang and James Kistler
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker Inc, The Board of Trustees of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., The Administrative Committee of the Stanley Black & Decker Retirement Account Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee, American Retirement Association and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Luckett v. Wintrust Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv03968
Plaintiff:
Lynetta Luckett
Defendant:
Wintrust Financial Corporation, The Board of Trustees of Wintrust Financial Corp., The Administrative Committee of the Wintrust Financial Corp. Retirement Savings Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Bracalente et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv04417
Plaintiff:
Robert Bracalente and Boris Gdalevich
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc., The Board of Trustees of Cisco Systems, Inc. and The Administrative Committee of the Cisco Systems, Inc. 401(K) Plan
Amicus Curiae:
American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee, American Retirement Association and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
THE ERISA INDUSTRY COMMITTEE v. ROBERT ASARO-ANGELO
as 3:2020cv10094
Plaintiff:
THE ERISA INDUSTRY COMMITTEE
Defendant:
ROBERT ASARO-ANGELO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The ERISA Industry Committee v. City of Seattle
as 2:2018cv01188
Plaintiff:
The ERISA Industry Committee
Defendant:
City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The ERISA Industry Committee v. Read
as 3:2017cv01605
Defendant:
Tobias Read
Plaintiff:
The ERISA Industry Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
United Steel, Paper, Forestry, et al v. Kelsey-Hayes Company, et al
as 13-1717
Amicus Curiae:
BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC., WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, ERISA INDUSTRY COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, DANNY O. STEVENS, for themselves and others similarly situated and RONALD D. STRAIT
Defendant / Appellant:
TRW AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORPORATION and KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
