Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Rivard v. NICE Systems, Inc.
as 1:2023cv10576
Plaintiff:
Christine Rivard
Defendant:
NICE Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
WALTERS v. NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2022cv01780
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WALTERS
Defendant:
NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Chen v. Chun Wang Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05986
Defendant:
Yan Qing Chen, Chun Wang Restaurant Inc. doing business as New Nice Chinatown doing business as Nice China Town, Ji Liang Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Guoqiang Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Minchala v. Nice N Natural Market Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01388
Defendant:
Eunhee Chung and Nice N Natural Market Inc.
Plaintiff:
Manuel Minchala
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nicely v. Cox Enterprises Inc
as 5:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Cox Enterprises Inc
Plaintiff:
Kyle Nicely
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Colley v. Super Nice Sts, Inc.
as 0:2019cv63093
Plaintiff:
Everton Lloyd Colley
Defendant:
Super Nice Sts, Inc. and Super Nice Sts, Inc. doing business as Transportation America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Thadal v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2019cv20767
Defendant:
Raymond Gonzalez, Transportation America, Inc., Super Nice STS, Inc., d/b/a Transportation America and others
Plaintiff:
Manoucheka Thadal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Jose Sanchez v. Nice Group USA, Inc.
as 5:2018cv01154
Defendant:
Nice Group USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Sanchez
Pierre v. Super Nice STS, Inc.
as 1:2017cv21767
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Pierre
Defendant:
Super Nice STS, Inc. and Raymond Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Transport Workers Union of Ame v. Veolia Transportation Service
as 16-3670
Petitioner - Appellee:
Transport Workers Union of America Local 252
Respondent - Appellant:
Veolia Transportation Services, Inc., DBA NICE Bus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
