Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hillary v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
as 7:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Steven S Hillary
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Soto v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Morayma Soto
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc. and John Doe Nos. 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal - ERISA
Blackwell v. Love's Travel Stop & Country Stores, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Tobious Blackwell
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stop & Country Stores, Inc.
Engstrom v Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
as 5:2021cv01967
Plaintiff:
Allen Engstrom
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Ellis et al v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
as 5:2021cv00308
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
JD Ellis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Shilling v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
as 5:2021cv00152
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shilling
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kendall v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03519
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Kendall
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
Both v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
as 1:2020cv04131
Plaintiff:
Timothy Both
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORTON v. LOVE'S TRAVEL STOPS & COUNTRY STORES, INC.
as 1:2019cv01193
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN LEANN HORTON
Defendant:
LOVE'S TRAVEL STOPS & COUNTRY STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Reed v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores et al
as 3:2019cv01043
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores and Gemini Motor Transport, LP
Plaintiff:
Bobby D. Reed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
