Cases 91 - 100 of 247
Sherman v. United Recovery Systems, LP et al
as 3:2016cv05560
Plaintiff:
William Sherman
Defendant:
United Recovery Systems, LP, Midland Funding, LLC and Gordon, Aylworth & Tami, PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv00973
Plaintiff:
William Sherman
Defendant:
United Recovery Systems, LP, Midland Funding, LLC and Gordon, Aylworth & Tami, PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Laverdure v. USA
as 2:2016cv00119
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Samuel Gordon Laverdure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Turay v. Quigley et al
as 3:2016cv05190
Plaintiff:
Richard G Turay
Defendant:
Kevin Quigley, John Clayton, Mark Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Gordon ("Casey") Powell et al v. Barnes et al
as 2:2016cv00352
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clay Powell, Sr. and Estate of Gordon ("Casey") Powell
Defendant:
Gary Barnes, Breeann Caraway, Keri Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newport Woods Community v. City of Newcastle et al
as 2:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
Newport Woods Community
Defendant:
City of Newcastle , City of Newcastle City Council , Rich Crispo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stroh v. Saturna Capital Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
Gordon Scott Stroh
Defendant:
Saturna Capital Corporation, Nicholas Kaiser, Deborah Kaiser and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Fair v. King County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2016cv00273
Plaintiff:
Emanuel D Fair
Defendant:
King County Correctional Center, Claudia Balducci, KCDAJD Policy Committee Member 2012 to Present and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bettys v. Quigley et al
as 3:2016cv05076
Plaintiff:
John E Bettys and Richard G Turay
Defendant:
Kevin Quigley, Mark Strong, Cathi Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Gordon et al
as 2:2015mc00190
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Stephen Bruce Gordon
Garnishee:
Bank of America NA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
