Cases 91 - 100 of 921
WAG Acquisition, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1633
Appellant:
WAG ACQUISITION, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
WAG Acquisition, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1634
Appellant:
WAG ACQUISITION, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gavina v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
as 5:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Jose Gavina
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
David Panian v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
David Panian
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Michael Deal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ornas et al v. AMAZON.COM. INC. et al
as 5:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Deanna Ornas, Estate of Stephen Ornas, Alison Ornas and others
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM. INC., Amazon.com Services, LLC, Amazon.com Sales, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mata v. Amazon.com Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv50049
Plaintiff:
Christian Mata
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, LLC and Industrial Development Authority of the City of Chandler Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
