Cases 91 - 100 of 188
Terel Dixon v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 17-2261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEREL DARNELL DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
DEEM v. BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH DEEM
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY, WILLIAM SCHOUPPE, JENNIFER MONZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOECHER v. DELON et al
as 2:2017cv00539
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KOECHER
Defendant:
BRANDON GARY DELON, COUNTY OF BEAVER, PENNSYLVANIA, PRISON BOARD OF BEAVER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VUKICH v. COMMONWEALTH BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00441
Petitioner:
WILLIAM E. VUKICH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH BEAVER COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Vukich v. Court of Common Pleas, et al
as 17-1761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. VUKICH
Defendant - Appellee:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Beaver County, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
THORNTON v. BEAVER COUNTY CYS et al
as 2:2017cv00375
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. THORNTON
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY CYS, NICOLE DICICCO, DAVID REESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Gary Robinson
as 17-1648
Petitioner:
In re: GARY ROBINSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
In re: George Durham
as 17-1466
Petitioner:
In re: GEORGE M. DURHAM
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
Beaver County Utah v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Beaver County Utah
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Kevin Haugrad, United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
George et al v. Beaver County et al
as 2:2016cv01076
Plaintiff:
Kathy M. George , Christal Shotwell and Christy Hass
Defendant:
Beaver County, Cameron M. Noel and Tyler Fails
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
