Cases 91 - 100 of 123
Smith v. Wilson et al
as 6:2011cv00102
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
Eric D. Wilson, Sheila R. Mattingly, Sheila Saylors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Van Tatenhove et al
as 6:2011cv00103
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
Gregory F. Van Tatenhove, Eric D. Wilson, C. Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrel Smith v. People of the State of CA
as 11-70415
Petitioner:
DARREL SMITH
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Smith v. Bramon
as 10-4663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Diane Bramon, D.T.C. Corp., Patrick J. Hearty, D.T.C. Corp., Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Smith v. Bramon et al
as 1:2010cv07665
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
Diane Bramon, Patrick J. Hearty, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 3:2010cv01235
Plaintiff:
Terry Darrell Smith
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. St. Louis County Police Department et al
as 4:2010cv01790
Plaintiff:
Mario Darrell Smith
Defendant:
St. Louis County Police Department, Florissant Police Department, Bolin Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. USA et al
as 6:2010cv00167
Petitioner:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Respondent:
USA, Harley G. Lappin, Donald L. Stine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabana et al v. Nothing Heavy Holding Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03924
Plaintiff:
Luis Cabana , Leopoldo Avalo and Darrell Smith
Defendant:
Nothing Heavy Holding Inc., Mitchell Woo and Renata Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Wilson
as 6:2010cv00034
Petitioner:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Respondent:
Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
