Cases 91 - 100 of 41,595
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-56349
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jean Gamarra v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 16-5257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jean Paul Gamarra
Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Hollis v. Lynch et al
as 3:2014cv03872
Plaintiff:
Jay Aubrey Isaac Hollis
Defendant:
Eric H Holder, Jr, B Todd Jones, Loretta E Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seavon Pierce v. President Barack Obama, et al
as 16-56194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, Attorney General, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, Attorney General and others
GAMARRA v. HOLDER
as 1:2016cv01663
Plaintiff:
JEAN PAUL GAMARRA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Anghel v. Commissioner of New York State
as 16-2743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M.D. Maria-Lucia Anghel
Defendant - Appellee:
Commissioner of New York State Department of Educa Mary Ellen Elia, in her official capacity, New York State Department of Health, The Board of Professional Medical Conduct and others
VANDIVERE et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv01594
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOW VANDIVERE and JON KARL THOMPSON
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH , ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , THOMAS KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Lewis v. USA, et al
as 16-5218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Janet Reno and others
Atkinson v. US Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr, et al
as 4:2016cv02177
Plaintiff:
Alan J. Atkinson
Defendant:
Eric H Holder, Jr and United States Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Pandit, et al v. Lynch
as 15-1149
Petitioner:
KAMINA PANDIT and SHAILESHKUMAR PANDIT
Not Classified By Court:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
