Cases 91 - 100 of 100
Frank Erite v. Ingram Micro, Inc.
as 8:2026cv00189
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Erite
Defendant:
Ingram Micro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wanda Brandon, et al v. Board of Education, St. Louis
as 26-1112
Plaintiff:
Wanda Brandon, Andrew Craig, Alice Crockett and others
Defendant:
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Kelvin R. Adams and Charles K. Burton
GRANTLEY v. TATUM et al
as 3:2026cv00282
Plaintiff:
DERRICK GRANTLEY
Defendant:
TORI TATUM, BELSER, M INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00458
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ingram
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Budget Rent A Car System, Inc., et al. v. Chesebro, et al.
as 26-279
Plaintiff:
BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC., BUDGET TRUCK RENTAL, LLC and ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
JOHN CHESEBRO, JACCI SIMON, ROSHANNA INGRAM and others
CHAPMAN v. PALLMEYER et al
as 1:2026cv00420
Plaintiff:
LAMAR C. CHAPMAN, III
Defendant:
REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, THOMAS G. BRUTON, VIRGINIA M. KENDALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ingram v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2026cv00166
Petitioner:
James Ingram, Jr.
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. City of Chandler, et al.
as 26-218
Plaintiff:
MARIO ALBERTO HERNANDEZ, for his two minor children L.H. and O.H.
Defendant:
CITY OF CHANDLER, CHANDLER MUNICIPAL COURT, CHANDLER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
