Cases 91 - 100 of 116
McIntosh, et al v. IndyMac Bank FSB et al
as 2:2011cv01805
Plaintiff:
Kent McIntosh and Elisa M McIntosh
Defendant:
IndyMac Bank FSB and OneWest Bank FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
McNeill v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01732
Petitioner:
Robert Kent McNeill
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Epperson et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2011cv01416
Plaintiff:
Harold Nathin Epperson and Lea Epperson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA , Jamie Dimon , Judith Kent Dimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv08062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Veazey v. Coolidge Police Department et al
as 2:2011cv00429
Plaintiff:
Raymond Veazey
Defendant:
Coolidge Police Department , Coolidge, City of , Jake Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marshall v. Ryan et al
as 2:2010cv02544
Petitioner:
Kent Marshall
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McNeill v. Ryan et al
as 2:2010cv01969
Petitioner:
Robert Kent McNeill
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schweiss v. Interceramic, Inc., et al
as 2:2010cv01225
Plaintiff:
Kent J Schweiss
Defendant:
Interceramic Incorporated and Interceramic Marble Collection Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Araiza v. Mecham
as 2:2010cv00188
Defendant:
Milton Kent Mecham
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Araiza
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kent v. Cummings et al
as 2:2009cv01616
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Joseph Kent
Defendant:
Unknown Cummings, Unknown Groody, Unknown Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
