Cases 91 - 100 of 64,260
Barnes v. Crawford County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv02077
Petitioner:
Eureka R. Barnes
Respondent:
Crawford County Sheriff's Office, Jason Cooper and Kevin Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Mawuili Adzasoo et al
as 2:2024cv05070
Petitioner:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Respondent:
Mawuili Adzasoo, Mohammad Albasha, David Oliver Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Amazon.Com, Inc. et al v. Almowlad et al
as 3:2024cv03627
Plaintiff:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Ahmed Ebrahim Almowlad, Kevin Estrada, Falope Fatunmise and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Isaacs v. City of Susanville et al
as 2:2024cv01707
Plaintiff:
Michael Isaacs
Defendant:
City of Susanville, Jerrad Lopez, Michael Hoover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swenson v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01513
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Kevin Swenson
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03097
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Greenidge v. Carter
as 24-10535
Plaintiff:
Kevin Greenidge
Defendant:
Philip Michael Carter, Richard Gregory Tilford and Bob Eugene Guess
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
