Cases 91 - 100 of 58,793
Prentiss v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03778
Plaintiff:
Jasheem Prentiss
Defendant:
City of New York, Kieran Ross, Matthew Arvelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Iroku v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Matthew Iroku
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McDevitt et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2024cv01471
Plaintiff:
Matthew McDevitt and Amy McDevitt
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kexin Gao v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv04335
Plaintiff:
Kexin Gao
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Los Angeles Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kloss v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 1:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kloss
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Matthew Jones v. Central District Station
as 24-7083
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Central District Station
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KEESE v. KARMA WESTFIELD et al
as 2:2024cv06439
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW T. KEESE
Defendant:
KARMA WESTFIELD, LEE MORANT, FUQUA AUTO SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
