Cases 91 - 100 of 112
Maurice Dunbar v. James Mett
as 11-6716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE DUNBAR
Plaintiff:
REGINALD C. MACK, LLOYD BENNETT, TERENCE HAYES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES METTS, in charge of Lexington County Detention Center and CITY COUNCIL, or Person Oursee of the Courts
Johnson v. City of Peoria et al
as 1:2011cv01153
Plaintiff:
Todd O'Dell Johnson
Defendant:
City of Peoria, City of Peoria, Department of Police and Michael McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mixon v. Peoria County et al
as 1:2010cv01264
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mixon
Defendant:
Peoria County, Michael McCoy and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar et al v. Mack et al
as 8:2010cv01775
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dunbar, Reginald C Mack, Lloyd Bennett and others
Defendant:
James Metts and City Council
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Peoria County Jail et al
as 1:2010cv01158
Plaintiff:
Ray E Allen
Defendant:
Peoria County Jail, Michael McCoy and Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hildebrand v. Chavez et al
as 4:2010cv01957
Plaintiff:
Michael McCoy Hildebrand
Defendant:
F.X. Chavez and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael McCoy v. USDCBOI
as 10-71414
:
In re: MICHAEL MCCOY
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MCCOY
Respondent:
USDC, BOISE
Real Party In Interest:
JOANNA SMITH
USA v. Michael McCoy
as 10-5098
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCCOY
McCoy et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv02901
Plaintiff:
Michael McCoy and Sarah McCoy
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation, I-Flow Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Michael McCoy v. USDCPOC
as 09-73569
:
In re: MICHAEL MCCOY
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MCCOY
Respondent:
USDC, POCATELLO
Real Party In Interest:
IDAHO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
