Cases 91 - 100 of 115
Bey et al v. Elliot et al
as 5:2014mc00042
Petitioner:
Tina Darsha Spencer Al Ali Bey and Sean Spencer Bey
Respondent:
Scott Elliot, North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper and Governor Pat McCrory
Murphy v. McCrory et al
as 5:2014ct03249
Plaintiff:
William T. Murphy
Defendant:
Pat McCrory, Roy Cooper and Chris Landrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUSH-EL v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2014cv00756
Plaintiff:
PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL
Defendant:
MARRY COVINGTON, PAT MCCRORY, ROY COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Burcham v. Pat McCrory
as 14-6822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD STEPHEN BURCHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
PAT MCCRORY, ROBERT C. LEWIS, ROY COOPER and others
Moses Faison v. State of North Carolina
as 14-6816
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOSES LEON FAISON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, PAT MCCRORY, N.C. INNOCENCE INQUIRY COMMISSION and others
Richard Burcham v. Pat McCrory
as 14-6819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD STEPHEN BURCHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
PAT MCCRORY, Governor of North Carolina, ROBERT C. LEWIS, Director of Prisons, ANTHONY E. RAND, Chairman, Post-Release Supervision and Parole and others
D'Alessandro et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Adam D'Alessandro, A. D. D., M. L. D. and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Pat McCrory, North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 5:2014ct03073
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Roy Cooper and Pat McCrory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
