Cases 91 - 100 of 573
Muhammad v. Weikel et al
as 1:2019cv01373
Defendant:
C.O. Hepner, C.O. White, C.O. Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00924
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RANDALL et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03345
Plaintiff:
GREGG BLANK, DORA G. RANDALL and MICHAEL RANDALL
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANEY v. AZAMATUULU et al
as 2:2019cv00797
Defendant:
UNITY TRANS INC., MARIFAT AZAMATUULU and BRANDON S. KONEK
Plaintiff:
RANDAL S. LANEY
Special Master:
JOHN R. DINGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mack v. Romulus Inc.
as 3:2019cv00992
Plaintiff:
Leanna Randall and Devin Mack
Defendant:
Romulus, Inc., RMLS-HOP Restaurants PA, L.P. and RMLS HOP Restaurants PA, LLP
PYATT v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02444
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MARIO COLUCCI, WARDEN DAVID BYRNES, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RANDALL PYATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARRELL v. SHANAHAN et al
as 2:2019cv00598
Defendant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY VOIT, RANDALL YETMAN, DR. DENIS HUROWITZ and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELA S. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
HYMAN v. ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02157
Defendant:
ZIMMER-RANDALL ASSOCIATES, INC., ZIMMER, ZIMMER BIOMET APEX SURGICAL, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD HYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSARIO v. RANDALL
as 5:2019cv02117
Defendant:
BRITTANY M. RANDALL
Plaintiff:
ELENA ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
ORKOWSKI v. MCCAULEY et al
as 2:2019cv02087
Defendant:
ROBERT A. LEIPZIGER, BRISTOL TOWNSHIP SEWER DEPARTMENT, RANDALL C. FLAGER and others
Plaintiff:
LUDWIG ORKOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
