Cases 91 - 100 of 1,969
EDWARDS v. HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP et al
as 1:2021cv03345
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, RYAN ANDREW MAURER, STRYKER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitfield v. Vocera Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Vocera Communications, Inc., Brent D. Lang, Howard E. Janzen and others
Moxchange LLC v. Stryker Corporation
as 1:2021cv05729
Plaintiff:
Moxchange LLC
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jeremy Wightman v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv08933
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wightman
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Employment Company, LLC and Does 1 to 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tubin v. Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv02347
Defendant:
AAP Implants, Inc., Stryker Corporation, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Ronald Tubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tanner v. Stryker Corporation of Michigan
as 8:2021cv02293
Plaintiff:
Tristan Tanner
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Sidebottom v. Stryker Corporation
as 1:2021cv11529
Plaintiff:
Craig Sidebottom
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stryker Corporation, et al v. XL Insurance America
as 21-2863
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STRYKER CORPORATION and HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant:
XL INSURANCE AMERICA
Rosado et al v. Fleet Courier, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05022
Plaintiff:
William Rosado and Youcef Aoutti
Defendant:
Fleet Courier, Inc. and Stryker Corporation
Cade et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 4:2021cv00359
Plaintiff:
LaDonna S Cade and John Cade
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics, Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
