Cases 91 - 100 of 329
ALLEN et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00167
Petitioner:
DENVER FENTON ALLEN
Respondent:
Walter Johnson, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD J TRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALLEN et al v. Johnson et al
as 5:2017cv00345
Petitioner:
DENVER FENTON ALLEN
Respondent:
Walter Johnson, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD J TRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BEAKLEY v. LANGE et al
as 1:2017cv06385
Plaintiff:
JANICE BEAKLEY
Defendant:
KRISTOPHER K. LANGE, CAMDEN COUNTY SOCIAL SECURITY COURT and TREASURY DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley Scott v. United States of America
as 17-13742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHLEY C. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TREASURY DEPARTMENT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ashley Scott v. United States of America
as 17-13741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHLEY C. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TREASURY DEPARTMENT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Claiborne v. United States et al
as 1:2017cv03377
Plaintiff:
Shanta Yvonne Claiborne
Defendant:
Federal Government, Kusi Fourdjour, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DAVID v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. DAVID
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PATENT TRADEMARK OFFICE, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keaton v. United States et al
as 1:2017cv00952
Plaintiff:
Eric Keaton
Defendant:
United States, Treasury Department, William Bratton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera-Lopez v. Perez et al
as 3:2016cv03178
Plaintiff:
Cosme Luis Rivera-Lopez
Defendant:
Victor Perez, Milagros Martinez, Treasury Department Agents I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
