Cases 101 - 110 of 340
Cobb v. Madlock et al
as 4:2019cv00262
Defendant:
Cindy Griffith, Donna Wigfall, Tracy Madlock and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cobb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacMann v. Tropicana Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00404
Defendant:
Tropicana St. Louis, LLC and Tropicana Entertainment, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Traci L. MacMann
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gooch v. O'Gorman
as 5:2019cv06008
Plaintiff:
Beverly M. Gooch
Defendant:
Hayden A. O'Gorman
Counter Defendant:
Tracy Spradlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hensley et al v. Precythe et al
as 4:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Kate Tyler, T. Bredeman, Angela M. Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McConnell et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2018cv02083
Plaintiff:
Leah Croxton, Viengxay Medina, David Prinster and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fortenberry v. West et al
as 4:2018cv01937
Defendant:
Mark West, Andrew Collier and City of St. Louis, Missouri
Plaintiff:
Tracy Fortenberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tracy v. The Hollis & Miller Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00887
Plaintiff:
Julie Tracy
Defendant:
Hollis & Miller Group Investments, L.L.C. and The Hollis & Miller Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marin v. Griffith et al
as 4:2018cv01815
Defendant:
Brian Pettus, Shannon Montgomery, Cindy Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Marin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enos v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv01698
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Tracy Enos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Love v. Price et al
as 4:2018cv01595
Defendant:
Tracy Price, Nurse Tracy, Lindsey Coffman and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
