Cases 101 - 110 of 748
Frazier v. Doe
as 4:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Frazier
Defendant:
Doe, Does 1-4, Doctor, Linda, Cook, Cheryl, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Terry L McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Stanley James, Gary McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beard v. Adams et al
as 4:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Francisco Beard
Defendant:
Adams, Baker, Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Michel et al
as 4:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Wesley Adam Reaves
Defendant:
Ben Michel, David Menotti and Shiloh Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Traylor v. Childer
as 4:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Traylor
Defendant:
Adam Childer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Siloam Springs, Arkansas et al
as 5:2022cv05040
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lockhart
Defendant:
Siloam Springs, Arkansas, James Wilmet, Allan Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Runion et al
as 4:2022cv04023
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Sheriff Jackie Runion, Warden Jeffie Walker, Captain G. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Gorman et al
as 4:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Corey Williams
Defendant:
Gorman and Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Johnson
as 4:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Andrews
Defendant:
Does, Brandon Johnson, Bryant Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. eStem Jr High et al
as 4:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Tamara Heard
Defendant:
eStem Jr High, John Bacon and Justin Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
