Cases 101 - 110 of 433
Harris v. IN State of et al
as 3:2020cv00894
Defendant:
Shaw, Bennet, Inman and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Deron Jordan Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2020cv00844
Plaintiff:
Courtney Johnson and Courtney D Johnson
Defendant:
Shaw, Bennet, Seagal and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Payne et al
as 3:2020cv00829
Defendant:
Hyatte, J Shaw, George Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spann-El v. Indiana The State of et al
as 3:2020cv00806
Plaintiff:
Richard A Spann-El and Richard Allen Spann El
Defendant:
Hyatte, Payne, Carty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Hyatt et al
as 3:2020cv00789
Defendant:
Robert A. Fels, Wexford, D. Sowards and others
Plaintiff:
Rhydeem Otthello Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE DURHAM WOOD FIRED PIZZA COMPANY LLC et al v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00856
Plaintiff:
PONYSAURUS BREWING LLC, THE DURHAM WOOD FIRED PIZZA COMPANY LLC D/B/A DASHI, ANGLE MANAGEMENT LLC D/B/A THE COOKERY and others
Defendant:
THE INSURANCE CENTER OF DURHAM, INC., THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY and MORRIS INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benge v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2020cv00699
Defendant:
Hyatte, Angle, Hawke and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Brandon Benge
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUDSON v. HYATT et al
as 2:2020cv00420
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATT, SHARRON HAWK, ANNETTE JONES and others
Plaintiff:
RHYDEEM OTTHELLO HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v Carter et al
as 3:2020cv00631
Defendant:
Wexford of Indiana LLC, Rob Carter, John Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Vernell Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
