Cases 101 - 110 of 429
Burt v. City of Pleasant Grove Alabama, The et al
as 2:2020cv01973
Defendant:
City of Pleasant Grove Alabama, The, ADA Butler, Corporal Matthew Stone and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Daniel Burt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seahorn v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01960
Defendant:
Jason Butler, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and Laura Lindsey
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Seahorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortenbury v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01004
Defendant:
John Crow, Cheryl Price, Reosha Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin DeWayne Fortenbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Singleton et al
as 3:2020cv01877
Defendant:
Jason Butler, Tracey Keeton, Vicki White and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Carroll, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00926
Defendant:
Montgomery County Detention Facility, Montgomery County Commissioner, Derrick Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher DeWayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarke v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00902
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Reosha Butler, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Wellington Emanuel Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Singleton et al
as 3:2020cv01580
Defendant:
Jason Butler, Tracy Keeton, Vicki White and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Carroll, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01412
Defendant:
Hunter Ray, Rick Singleton, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00648
Plaintiff:
James Edward Holland
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starr v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00641
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
