Cases 101 - 110 of 7,813
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lopez Chavez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2496
Petitioner:
MARIO EDGARDO LOPEZ CHAVEZ, ANGELA BERENICE LOPEZ ARGUETA, SINTHYA JUDIT LOPEZ ARGUETA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12134 Americans with Disabilities Act (IDEA) Education
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rabb v. Figueroa, et al.
as 24-2452
Plaintiff:
DAMEN D. RABB
Defendant:
ESTEVEN FIGUEROA, Correctional Officer and EMMANUEL CHAVEZ, Correctional Officer
Rivera Brito et al v. New Life Healthy Living, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Isabela Rivera Brito, Maria Brito Chavez, Petrona Cuplay Bernal and others
Defendant:
New Life Healthy Living, LLC, New Life Adult Medical Day Care, LLC, Aashiana, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chavez v. Warden, FCI La Tuna, FBOP
as 3:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Raul Chavez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI La Tuna, FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chavez v. Pennington, et al.
as 24-2357
Plaintiff:
JUAN CHAVEZ, Chief Maestro Chavez and Juan Pablo Chavez
Defendant:
JERMILL PENNINGTON, Property Manager and DOES
United States of America v. Chavez
as 24-963
Defendant:
RAUL CHAVEZ, ANDREW DURON, JESSIE ROSALES and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
