Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 200
Pohly v. Intuitive Surgical Inc
as 3:2016mc00079
Plaintiff: Richard Pohly
Defendant: Intuitive Surgical Inc
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Ethicon US, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv04794
Plaintiff: Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Defendant: Ethicon US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Braude v. Intuitive Surgical Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02847
Plaintiff: James Steven Braude, M.D.
Defendant: Intuitive Surgical Inc. , Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dawson v. Sohn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00827
Plaintiff: Teri Dawson
Defendant: Woo Hyun Sohn , Southern Illinois Healthcare d/b/a Memorial Hospital of Carbondale and Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Nassar Cure et al v. Intuitive Surgical Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01948
Plaintiff: Gabriel Fernando Nassar Cure and Alan M. Kozarsky, M.D.
Defendant: Intuitive Surgical Inc. , Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward et al v. Intuitive Surgical Inc
as 5:2016cv00510
Plaintiff: Keith Lamont Ward and Jacqueline Babin Ward
Defendant: Intuitive Surgical Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moreno v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00399
Defendant: Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Plaintiff: Deborah Linda Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Nagle et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01068
Plaintiff: Olof R. Nagle and Paul Nagle
Defendant: Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charest v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 1:2015cv13980
Plaintiff: Peter Charest
Defendant: Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clement v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 2:2015cv06189
Plaintiff: Tiffany Clement
Defendant: Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?