Cases 101 - 110 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010mc00005
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 0101 Bankruptcy
Butler, et al v. Shelby County, et al
as 2:2003cv02650
Plaintiff:
Lynell Marcus Butler , Kevin Andersen , Myron Arps and others
Defendant:
Shelby County Government , Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and Annie's Pest Control Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2009cv00706
Plaintiff:
John Brooks and John Brooks
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Albert Page v. A. Padula
as 09-6903
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT D. PAGE
Defendant - Appellee:
A. J. PADULA, Warden, ROBERT WARD, Directional Divisional Operations, JOHN BROOKS, Associate Warden and others
Defendant - None:
MS. WHITNEY, mailroom personnel at Lee Correctional Institution
John Brooks v. Anchor Packing Co., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-61869
Plaintiff:
John Brooks
Defendant:
Anchor Packing Co
United States of America v. Morgan et al
as 6:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard E. Morgan, Mary A. Morgan, Tri-Morgan Family Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
BROOKS v. ANCHOR PACKING CO et al
as 2:2009cv61869
Plaintiff:
JOHN BROOKS, JOHN BROOKS, JOHN BROOKS and others
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING CO, ANCHOR PACKING CO, ANCHOR PACKING CO and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Schexnayder et al v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
as 2:2008cv01766
Plaintiff:
Gloria Schexnayder, Joseph Broussard, Tangela Pappillion-Semien and others
Defendant:
Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILLARD et al v. STECKMAN RIDGE, LP
as 3:2008cv00245
Plaintiff:
JOHN BROOKS WILLARD and INCI K. WILLARD
Defendant:
STECKMAN RIDGE, LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
