Cases 101 - 110 of 1,023
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Porter v. Peden et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Amos Porter, Jr.
Defendant:
John Michael Peden, II, John Doe Entities 1-5 and John Doe Persons 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Houston, Jr. v. Turner et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Fredie Dean Houston, Jr.
Defendant:
William Joey Turner, Jordan Ramsey, Justin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INSETTA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05069
Plaintiff:
JOHN-MICHAEL INSETTA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. Hyundai Motor America Corporation
as 1:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
John Michael Smith and Michael W Smith
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Enard v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00627
Petitioner:
John Michael Enard
Respondent:
Bobbie Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DARDEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03293
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL DARDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Ray, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
WAINWRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01928
Plaintiff:
JEREMY JOHN MICHAEL WAINWRIGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carmody v. Orndorff
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
John Michael Carmody
Defendant:
Nicole Lynn Orndorff
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 6503 Walsh-Healy Act - Breach of Public Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
