Cases 101 - 110 of 114
Chavez v. Wackenhut Correction Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00696
Plaintiff:
Henry R Chavez
Defendant:
Wackenhut Correction Corporation, Joe R Williams, Patrick W Snedeker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Steele et al v. GE Money Bank et al
as 1:2008cv01880
Plaintiff:
Herbert Steele, Herbert Steele, Herbert Steele and others
Defendant:
GE Money Bank, WMC Mortgage Corporation and WMC Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chavez v. Astrue
as 5:2007cv01353
Plaintiff:
Pete R Chavez
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hama v. Chavez et al
as 1:2007cv01019
Petitioner:
Prshang Hama
Respondent:
Maria R. Chavez, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on Denials of Applications for Naturalization
Marouf v. Chavez et al
as 1:2007cv01021
Petitioner:
Rahma Mohammad Marouf
Respondent:
Maria R. Chavez, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on Denials of Applications for Naturalization
Ahmed v. Chavez et al
as 3:2007cv02824
Plaintiff:
Nada Ahmed
Defendant:
Maria R. Chavez, Michael Chertoff and Robert Mueller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv05967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Al Saedy v. Chavez
as 1:2007cv00819
Plaintiff:
Haider Al Saedy
Defendant:
Maria R. Chavez
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on Denials of Applications for Naturalization
CHAVEZ V DVA
as 07-7062
Claimant-Appellant:
Nolasco R. Chavez
Respondent-Appellee:
R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
